Stop the Secrecy

Companies admit usage limits are not about congestion.

Mon, 12/31/1973 - 16:48 -- Joel Milne


Cable companies (in the U.S.) finally admit that usage limits are not about congestion as they had insisted for years, and as many companies continue to insist.
Unfortunately, individuals in countries around the world still experience limits on their Internet use. We need an open, accessible, and affordable Internet. Spread the word - sign the Declaration of Internet Freedom and stand up for an accessible Internet:


Article by Karl Bode for DSL Reports:

For years the cable industry insisted that they imposed usage caps because network congestion made them necessary. You'll recall that Time Warner Cable insisted that if they weren't allowed to impose caps and overages the Internet would face "brown outs." Cable operators also paid countless think tanks, consultants and fauxcademics to spin scary yarns about a looming network congestion "exaflood," only averted if cable operators were allowed to raise rates, impose caps, eliminate regulation or (insert pretty much anything here).
The problem of course was that real data from researchers like Andrew Odlyzko repeatedly showed that well-run fixed line networks don't have serious capacity issues, and that looming video growth was easily handled by even modest network investment. 
It only took the better part of a decade, but the cable industry has apparently realized they can no longer pretend that caps are really about congestion. Speaking at a meeting this week, former FCC boss turned top cable lobbyist Michael Powell finally acknowledged caps weren't about congestion, though he did continue pushing the myth that caps are about "fairness" Read more »


Read the full article at

Make Internet access a priority - sign and share the Declaration of Internet Freedom.